After rocking San Jose, Sunidhi Chauhan & Ali Zafar
ready to thrill LA
Sunday blues! What
Sunday blues? Especially if you get a chance to hear two bright South Asian
music stars sing on a Sunday night and fill you up with adrenaline for the rest
of the week. In a concert dubbed Krazy 2
Sunidhi Chauhan and Ali Zafar performed at the San Jose University Event Center
on Sunday, April 7. And what a
memorable, thrilling performance it was!
Sunidhi Chauhan is an amazing singer who with her aeonic stamina can go
on entertaining the crowd for hours. On
April 7, Sunidhi Chauhan, Ali Zafar, Rakesh Maini, and the accompanying dancers
enthralled the 2000 plus crowd for over three and a half hours. Proceeds from the concert benefited Sankara
Eye Foundation, a non-profit organization with a vision to be able to perform
one million free eye surgeries annually by the year 2020.
Sunidhi Chauhan and Ali Zafar will cast their magic again on
April 20 at the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles.
In a press conference held the next day Sankara Eye
Foundation organizers of the concert, Murali Krishnamurthy, Yogi Patel, Barjesh
P Upadhyay, Sachindra Nath and others explained to the reporters Sanakar’s
goals. Sunidhi Cahuhan and Ali Zafar
answered questions about their personal lives and professional aspirations.
Sunidhi Chauhan and Ali Zafar’s North America tour is being
promoted by Mr. Rakesh Kaushal (Rocky).
There are over 60,000 living NED graduates in the world today. With such a large population, it is expected that NED alumni will be found in diverse fields. It should not be surprising to learn that a few NEDians have even been implicated in ‘jihad’ activities. Let's start with Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, a 2001 Computer Engineering graduate from the NED University. There are conflicting reports about his involvement with Al-Qaeda. Some describe Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan as the IT Chief of Al-Qaeda, others consider him a CIA operative assigned to penetrate the terrorist network. This NEDian was arrested in 2004, but was later released for ‘lack of evidence.’
Another NEDian known for jihad is TV analyst, Zaid Hamid, a 1989 Computer Engineering graduate. It is said that Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid was enrolled at the NED University when he went to Afghanistan for jihad against the Soviet Union.
The latest allegation of an NEDian’s involvement in terrorist activities has come from Portland, Oregon where Reaz Qadir Khan, a 1987 Mechanical Engineering graduate was arrested--later released on bail bond--for providing material support to terrorists.
Photo courtesy of Yahoo
[Reuters/U.S. Marshall Service/Handout]
Tags:
The NED University Terrorists
The NED Taliban
Al-Qaeda and the NED
War on Terror and the NED
University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Pakistan
NED graduates and the War on
Terror
Jihad by the NED Alumni
NEDian, NEDians arrested Riaz Khan, Riaz Qadir Khan, Ryaz Qadir, Riaz Kadir, Riaz Qadeer, Reaz Qadeer
ریاض قادر خان، این ای ڈی یونیورسٹی، القاءدہ، طالبان، علی جلیل مالدیپی، خود کش حملہ آور، لاہور، ریاض خان
Pakistan is a failed state and
cannot guarantee your security. The
failure of the state is obvious in the daily news of target-killings, terrorist
attacks, and kidnappings for ransom: most of these cases remain unsolved.
AVOID travel to Pakistan if
you can.
BUT if you have to…
Pakistan is slightly 'safer'
for travelers of Pakistani descent and others who don’t stand out as people of
European descent.
If you are of Pakistani
descent you are ‘safe’ in urban centers—restrict your movement and keep only
close relatives and friends informed about your travel plans. Pakistani-descent people are relatively
‘safe’ traveling on train on the main N-S line (Karachi to Peshawar).
In Sind, traveling by bus or
car on the east side of the Indus is slightly ‘safer’ than traveling on the west
side of that river.
In Punjab (and specially north
of Multan), traveling by bus during daytime should be safe. It is also ‘safe’ to travel by bus to
Peshawar.
It is not safe to travel in
Balochistan if you are not a Baloch or Pashtun.
Even if you are Pushtun you should avoid traveling south of Quetta--it
is all Allah-Nazar country where ethnic cleansing seems to be the adopted policy of
the Baloch nationalists (more murders like that of Mehmood Afridi coming up
soon--Punjabis and Muhajirs have been fair game for a much longer time).
Travelers of European descent
If you really, really, really
have to travel to Pakistan, the ‘safest’ place to travel to is Islamabad. Fly in Islamabad, move around in Islamabad,
and fly out of Islamabad.
If you are traveling to
Karachi, leave the airport and reach back to it only during daytime, with good
traffic on Shahra e Faisal. Ditto for
Lahore. It is also relatively ‘safe’ to
cross Wagah border into Pakistan and then take taxi to Lahore. Traveling on Daewoo buses in northern Punjab, during daytime should also be 'safe.' Do NOT travel in KP or Balochistan—unless you
wish to financially support the Taliban or the Baloch nationalists for their
respective wars, through ransom money to be paid by your relatives/government.
[This writer feels qualified
to give travel advice not only because he keeps his ear to the ground, but also
because has been traveling to Pakistan every year. In January 2013, he took
Khyber-Mail from Karachi to Mirpur Mathelo; traveled by car from MM to
Sadiqabad; took Daewoo bus from Sadiqabad to Multan; after a short stay in
Multan, took another bus from Multan to Lahore.
A couple of years back he flew from Karachi to Gwadar, stayed there and
watched with interest Chinese engineers escorted to the airport in armored
vehicle. He has also traveled on bus
from Old Sabzee Mandi in Karachi to Quetta; has taken train from Quetta to
Taftan (crossing into Iran); has taken a 4X4 from Taftan to Quetta. Has also flown from Karachi to Dalbadin and then
taken 4X4 taxi to Taftan. He has
traveled overland from Karachi to Khunjerab (crossing into China); has crossed Wagah
into India by train and on foot, multiple times; there have many other trips
throughout Pakistan. He once found
himself stranded at the Dadu train station unable to go to Moenjo Daro because
of a ‘police muqabla’, with IG Sindh surrounded by unhappy armed people. In short, he has firsthand knowledge of
Pakistan’s gradual descent into chaos.]
Tags:
Will I be safe in Pakistan? Is traveling in Pakistan safe?
Is Iran-Pakistan border crossing safe? Is it safe to go to Pakistan
overland from India? Is overland travel in Pakistan safe? Is it
safe to travel by train in Pakistan? Train travel in Pakistan. Bus
travel in Pakistan. Karachi to Lahore train. Karachi to Peshawar train.
Karachi to Quetta train. Quetta to Zahedan train. Pakistan travel information. Pakistan travel warning. Tourism in Pakistan. Sightseeing in Pakistan. A trip to Pakistan.
Please
fight the temptation to visit Pakistan. There are at least two civil wars going
on there. If you visit, there is a very
good chance that you will be either killed or kidnapped for ransom.
Czech women tourists kidnapped in Balochistan: officials
QUETTA: Unidentified gunmen on Wednesday kidnapped two women tourists from the Czech Republic in Pakistan’s insurgency-hit southwestern province of Balochistan, officials said.
Local government officials said the women entered the province from Iran as tourists and were abducted from an area some 550 kilometres (350 miles) west of Quetta, the main town of Balochistan which borders both Iran and Afghanistan.
“Both the women were from Czech Republic and entered in Pakistan as tourists,” Akbar Hussain Durrani, the provincial home secretary told AFP.
“Gunmen stopped their bus in the Nok Kundi area of Chaghi district and abducted both of them.” Durrani said women were being escorted by a tribal policeman when they were abducted. The guard was also taken captive but was later freed.
Nobody from the Czech embassy was available to comment late Wednesday but Qambar Dashti, a senior government official in Quetta confirmed the incident.
Kidnappings plague parts of Balochistan and northwest Pakistan, where criminals looking for ransom snatch foreigners and locals, sometimes passing their hostages on to Taliban and al Qaeda-linked groups.
Balochistan has been hit by an insurgency in recent years with Baloch nationalists demanding political autonomy and a greater share of profits from the province’s wealth of natural oil, gas and mineral resources.
Attacked with US drones, torn
apart from internal sectarian strife, Pakistan looks for a savior in a retired
sportsman
Though Imran
Khan is still the cult leader Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has grown around,
there are now other recognizable faces in that young political party’s
leadership. Fauzia Kasuri is one of those four or five prominent persons that
came to mind when you think of the PTI top brass. On Sunday, March 10, Kasuri
spoke to a 60-plus gathering of PTI supporters passionately—and with
troublesome religious overtones—about the need for a change in Pakistan,
claiming her boss, Imran Khan, can turn things around in that troubled country. The fund-raiser, organized by the Bay Area
chapter of PTI was held at the Mehran Restaurant in Newark.
While many young
starry-eyed Pakistanis are swayed by Imran Khan’s charm, historians are taking
notes of PTI’ promises—the two most important being that after coming in power in
Pakistan, PTI will:
Make Pakistan disassociate
itself from the US War on Terror and have US stop all drone attacks.
Wipe off all institutional corruption
within 90 days.
Besides the main guest, Dr. Dianne Budd (a Code Pink volunteer who participated
in PTI’s 2012 march in protest of US drone attacks), Shahab Siddiqui (of Mehran
Restaurant), Aftab Yaqub, Javed Tufail, and M. Irfan also spoke at the program.
Eating Grass: An Insider’s Account of the Pakistani
Nuclear Program
A few English speakers will definitely be surprised
to know that the first part of the title of Feroz Hassan Khan’s book “Eating
Grass: The Making of the Pakistani bomb” has no relation to the phrase ‘smoking
grass.’ ‘Eating grass’ is a literal
translation of an Urdu saying; an idiomatic translation of that phrase will be
‘Going hungry.’ The ‘Eating grass’
phrase used in this context comes from a 1965 statement made by the then
Pakistani Foreign Minister, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Bhutto, responding to news of India’s plans
to make an atomic bomb said if India made a bomb, the Pakistanis would go
through any hardship to attain matching nuclear capability.
What makes Brigadier (Retired) Feroz Hassan Khan
qualified to write a book on Pakistan’s nuclear program, taking the reader
through its various historical phases?
First, Feroz Khan is a scholar and a defense analyst, currently teaching
at Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, and second, more
importantly, serving in the Strategic Plans Division, Joint Services
Headquarters of the army, Feroz Khan was involved with Pakistan Army’s
supervision of the nuclear program till his retirement in 2003. ‘Eating Grass: The Making of the Pakistani
bomb’ is very much an insider’s account of the Pakistani nuclear program.
Feroz Hassan Khan’s book, published by the Stanford
University Press, is being promoted in Pakistan and the US through book review
meetings. On Sunday, February 10, over
150 people attended a discussion on ‘Eating Grass’ held at Fremont Marriott.
The program was arranged by Sabahat Rafiq, a Democratic Party delegate for the
2012 Democratic Convention, and Naveed Sherwani, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur.
The
program began with an introduction of the book and the writer by Sabahat Rafiq. Rafiq said, “Interwoven in this story
[Brigadier Feroz Khan’s account of the making of the bomb] are some fundamental
strategic policies of the First World narrative for non-proliferation wherein
the former seeks to badger the later into non-proliferation and yet fails to
provide guarantee for their security and territorial integrity. To add insult
to injury there is an ever pervasive suggestion of First World’s hegemony over
common sense, innovation, and sensible responsibility…and sometimes outright
contempt.
“The
former also continues to swap alliances and partnerships based on their own
shifting strategic interests, to maintain global hegemony without due regard to
the security interest of a former ally.”
Rafiq narrated to the audience Pakistan’s various
phases of alliance [with the US] Feroz Khan had identified in his book. These phases were: most allied of the allies
in the 60s, the most sanctioned ally in the 90s, and the most bullied ally in
the 2000s.
Sabahat Rafiq briefly described the five stages —delineated
in the book—Pakistani nuclear program passed through. The five phases being: i) Reluctant Phase,
from 60s to 1971; ii) Secret Nuclear R&D Program phase, a corollary of the
‘Never Again’ conviction [after Pakistan’s humiliating defeat by the Indian
Army in 1971], iii) the 80s and 90s phase, pertaining to the weaponization of
the nuclear capability, and demonstration of that strength, iv) Post-98 era wherein Pakistan’s nascent
nuclear program was to be tuned into an operation deterrent , and v) Present
Stage (Post 911)—when Pakistan’s nuclear capability is watched with interest,
by the world.
In
his speech Feroz Hassan Khan said it took him more than a decade to write the
book. He said shortly after joining the Naval Postgraduate School in 2003,
the news of AQ Khan’s revealed network stunned Pakistan. A ship named BBC China was caught in the
Mediterranean-- allegedly, the German ship bound for Libya from Dubai was carrying
centrifuge parts made in Malaysia, to AQ Khan’s design.
Feroz
Khan said a year after that incident he was interviewing Musharraf in
Pakistan. Khan asked Musharraf what was
the most difficult of the five crises Musharraf went through during his tenure
as the head of the army—the five crises being the Kargil war, the 1998 coup,
911, 2002 standoff with India, and the AQ Khan scandal. Musharraf told
Khan it was the AQ Khan ordeal. Khan was curious to know why the AQ Khan
case was so debilitating for Musharraf.
According to Feroz Khan, Musharraf said, “In all previous crises, as a
military man, my gut would tell me what to do.” But this was one crisis, whose extent he
(Musharraf) did not know, whose implication he did not understand…this was like
a train hitting him straight. Feroz Khan
told Musharraf of his apprehension that from then on (after the revelation of
AQ Khan’s network selling nuclear technology to all willing to pay) Pakistan’s
nuclear program would be reviewed through only one lens. Musharraf asked Khan what could be done about
that [so that Pakistan’s nuclear program would not be reviewed so unfavorably
by the international community]. Feroz
Khan suggested to Musharraf the best way was to get to the world a holistic
picture of the program (through a book).
Musharraf agreed with Khan. A year later Khan and Peter Lavoy (presently
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Asian and Pacific Security
Affairs)—both Khan and Lavoy were going to write the book together—presented a
comprehensive outline of how they intended to proceed, and requested access to
Pakistani nuclear professionals and to declassified documents. According to Khan, after a very careful
scrutiny Khan and Lavoy were allowed to interview retired scientists, military and
civilian officials, and academics. After
Lavoy left the book writing project in 2007 to accept a government job, Khan
took it upon himself to complete the work.
Feroz
Khan said critics of his book accuse him of playing down the AQ Khan
scandal. He said his book does not go too much into the detail of the
scandal as three to four books on that subject already exist.
Feroz
Khan considers his book “a human story, a book about a country’s life history. It is just not about proliferation (alone).” He described to the audience the “seven
factors” he had weaved in the book: 1) the ‘strategic culture’, Pakistan’s historical
experience and how it feels about its existence in the world, ii) domestic
politics, iii) regional security crises and wars, iv) cold war, the alliance
politics, the disillusionment with the alliance, while cleverly benefiting from
the alliance politics, v) the international non-proliferation regime and the
challenges, a section in the book is called ‘the Toms and Jerrys of the World’,
vi) idiosyncrasies of the personalities, and vii) the technical determinism.
Feroz
Khan’s speech was followed by a Q&A session moderated by Sabahat Rafiq.
Dr.
Syed Rifaat Hussain, a professor of security studies from Pakistan, currently
visiting the Stanford University was also invited to give his views on the book
and on Pakistan’s nuclear program.
There is a lot of confusion about this year’s NED Alumni Convention. Where is it going to be? When? It is almost the end of February and we don’t know much about the date or the venue of NED Alumni Convention 2013. The other day I was talking to a friend based in the UAE; he wanted to attend this year’s convention and apply for the US visa--it is currently taking 4-6 months for the US to process visa applications of Pakistan citizens. I asked him to apply for the US visa after registering for the convention, so that he would have something to show to the consulate. But he cannot register for the convention because no web site has been created for this year’s NEDian Convention.
Two religious scholars from Jamia Uloom-e-Islamia
of Banuri Town and a student were ambushed and killed in a brazen target
killing operation in the very crowded Nursery area of Karachi on Thursday,
January 31. Abdul Majeed Deenpuri, Mufti
Saleh Muhamad , and student Muhammad Hassan Ali Shah (driver) were traveling in
a Suzuki high-roof when they were targeted in broad daylight.
Here is the camera footage of the killing.
We believe this a fairly simple case to solve. Here is how.
What do we know about the killing?
We know the date, time, and exact place.
Any basic information about the killers?
The surveillance camera footage is not very clear
to recognize the faces of the three men, but heights of two men who fired their
guns can be estimated in comparison with the height of the Suzuki high-roof-- based
on the time of the day and the length of the shadows, estimates of heights can
be corroborated.
Information about where the killers came from and
where they went
The same camera that shows the killing can possibly
give us information about the time when these three men arrived at the scene,
and the direction they came from. Based
on that information we can use surveillance cameras on other buildings to trace
their path to the scene. The footage
clearly shows where they went. Footage
from cameras mounted on various buildings should be pieced together to
establish the escape route of the killers and any other information we can
gather.
Eye-witnesses
Yes, there were at least two. The two people (roadside vendors?) you see running
to take cover at 0:21 (after hearing the first shots) must have seen the three
men waiting at the crime scene, for the arrival of the high-roof.
Establishing the identity of the killers
The target-killers knew that the high-roof was
coming to that intersection. Clearly there
was a regular daily schedule people in the high-roof people kept. How did the killers find out that
schedule? Most probably by following the
high-roof for a couple of days. We
should look at the surveillance camera footage from previous days to establish
who had been following the high-roof.
It is also very certain that someone followed the Suzuki
high-roof on the day of the killing too.
The high-roof could be stuck in traffic, but the killers needed to be
alert at the right time. There must have
been someone who followed the high-roof from the point it started moving and
came following it the all the way to Nursery.
Who was it? We believe it was the
motorcyclist in light-colored shirt we see at 0:27 (he stops his motorcycle to
check out the scene).
The person who was following the Suzuki high-roof
must have been communicating with these three people on the mobile phone. Anyone who
uses modern technology to commit a crime leaves behind a lot of evidence. Narrowing the time of the killing,
investigations can be made about the cell phone numbers in connection with the
cell-phone towers of the area, during that time. The investigators can get records from the
cell phone companies having service in that area, for calls made in that
particular geographical area (cell) on that day and at that time. There can possibly be hundreds of cell phone
calls made through various phone companies during that time, in that particular
cell, but unnecessary information can be quickly eliminated narrowing on time and using the other very big clue: the phone
that was in communication with the killer’s phone was changing towers (as it
was moving towards Nursery).
With all these evidences left-behind by the killers
nabbing them should be easy and quick.
This Martin Luther King Day over 150 protesters gathered at the San Jose City Hall to remember victims of terrorist attacks in Pakistan in general and of Quetta blasts of January 10 in particular. The twin blasts on Alamdar Road in Quetta targeted Hazara Shias and claimed more than 100 lives.
Speakers at
the vigil protested against routine Shia killings in Pakistan and spoke highly
of the Hazaras of Quetta who, after the January 10 blasts, sat in open, in sub-zero
temperatures, with the coffins of their family members and friends killed in
the blasts, to register their peaceful protest.
The candlelight vigil organized by SABA Youth was attended by members of SABA (Shia Association of Bay Area) and other concerned citizens.
Let me tell you about two Parsi friends.
They were in the wine trade.
Then came Pakistan.
And Rustom said, Let’s have whisky. You
bring yours, and I'll bring mine.
We will finish two bottles today.
At the end of the dinner they finished their bottles
Then one said, We are damn fools.
Fourteen hundred years ago we were thrown by these MFs, and now we are caught
again.
It is not a story.
We ran away 1400 years ago from these MFs, Chs, MCs, and then we are caught
again.
Yes, yes, difference of 1400 years.
Like what?
Who worries about the language?
There was a time when Jews were made to wear yellow badges.
I'll show you a picture of the Parsi community of Iran. All wearing yellow medals.
It was done to the Parsis, Anybody who is not a Musalman,
pay the jazia tax or whatever, and he will be wearing a yellow badge. So these chaps got together and said, If instead
of wearing a round thing, we make it look like a medal, and wear it as an
insignia, these Chs will be happy, and we will be able to live.
That's what they did.
They are all wearing yellow medals.
(In Urdu) Ask us to put red, and we will put red.
The thing to do is to survive.
What am I? Trying to
change them? I am trying to survive this
lot.
We had the largest empire. Cyrus had the largest empire.
He was a generous man.
But then he had something here.
Persepolis
He had something here.
I don’t want an empire.
People come and tell me, Parsi race is getting extinct. Yes,
So?
Parsis are getting extinct.
They will disappear from the face of the earth. Yeah. So?
What’s your problem?
You know these guys who write PhD thesis. They say, You are finishing.
Yes, So?
In Pakistan there are 2000 (Parsis).
This guy came from Multan. Visiting me. He runs the Cancer Society there. Because of his name and he is a Parsi, people
(trust him and) give money.
I gave him money. I
said, how many (Paris) are left now (in Multan)? He said, Just one.
I can worship in my shower.
I can worship sitting on the pot.
I don’t believe in temples.
I mean, all these gurus and priests.
Who said you cannot pray sitting on the pot?
How does your sitting on the pot make you impure?
You are still you.
I say ’thank you’ every night. That’s all.
When I go up I say goodbye to all these buggers (pointing to
the statues of his ancestors). Thank
you.
[On Pakistan’s direction.]
Do I look worried?
[Telling me why living in the US, Pakistan-Americans should
not worry about Pakistan.]
My son is in America. He is an architect. He said, “I would like to start my life
here" when he finished his architecture at Cornell and then he went to
Harvard. He is a Harvard graduate. Did
his masters. Master of (unintelligible)
design. Then for five years he was with
I.M. Pei. He said, “Why would I come to Karachi?” He says, “I would like to (unintelligible).” I said, “Go, do.” He was sharp enough, I mean good enough for
I.M. Pei to say, “Join us.” Joining I.M. Pei, you know who I.M. Pei is? American architect, of Chinese descent. He sent my son to China. He stayed there forever. (unintelligible) (unintelligible)
Business was gone. This
MC called Bhutto, he nationalized shipping.
Business is carrying on. (unintelligible)
It is still running (unintelligible), partners. My brothers are there, my daughter is
there. When it will die it will
die.
It ran for five generations.
It cannot go on forever.
[On telling him that some are upset on his support of
Musharraf.]
Why?
If you are a better person than the bloody lot I see, I…
System? You think we
have democracy? I mean these guys are
running a democracy?
Is this a democracy?
NO, these chaps, MQM fellows.
PPP, thieves?
Nawaz Sharif, thief?
Chaudhry (Shujaat Hussain), thief?
Mullah, MC.
So, who should one choose?
I said he (Musharraf) is the best of the worst lot, I say
that way.
One can say (unintelligible)
Am I a supporter of Musharraf? Yes.
Yes, yes. (unintelligible)
All I want is good governance.
In Urdu,
Be it the garbage collector, the cobbler, or MC thief, or
whoever. All I want is peace.
(unintelligible)
democracy all these years. Up till
Jinnah
[On asking him if there is any hope.]
(You keep asking me if) There is hope, there is hope. I say ‘No.’
And why do you waste the film?
You will get nowhere.
You follow? So keep the subject
off.
Why are you wasting your time, my time, and the bloody film.
(You keep repeating) Why did you say this, why did you say
this?
I just look at what’s available. And choose the best I think.
What has been the American policy?
It is to follow what George Washington said. That you can’t have permanent friends or
permanent enemies. (unintelligible)
They have not shifted from their original policy.
Who was Washington?
General. Who was
Eisenhower? A general. Who was MacArthur? A general.
Some were not, some were.
The fact that they were generals does not disqualify them.
(unintelligible) come
up (unintelligible) MacArthur.
If there had been another bloody general the (unintelligible)
No.
[On what is his opinion of Imran Khan.]
Who? Imran Khan?
Good f****er.
Good Cricketer.
He has lots of ideas.
That’s his (Hoodbhoy’s) opinion.
No.
He (Musharraf) is the best of the worst lot. I have written that he is the best of the
worst lot.
It is like saying if there are many CHs then he is the best CH.
Best of the five that I see.
You like Altaf Hussain?
You like Benazir?
You like Asif?
You like Mulla?
Mullas (unintelligible)
we are afraid (of them)
Scary, man!
[On Zil e Huma’s murder.]
Why (unintelligible)
poor woman (unintelligible)
Beautiful woman, at the prime of her life.
The bugger did not feel like appreciating (unintelligible)
Why is he alive today?
He should be locked up in seven days, but he won’t be locked
up.
[Introducing the visitors who came at that point.]
Zahoor, the artist was married to his sister.
A man came and shot Zahoor, and his daughter.
This is the mother, his mother, you’ll be mixed up.
You know that bugger is still free.
No, no, no. He is
sentenced to death.
He is on death row.
How many years ago was it?
Seven…Eight, nine years ago.
This bugger will stay on for another seven eight years. He’ll survive Musharraf.
If you ask me today, Who will die earlier, he or
Musharraf? I’ll say chances are Musharraf will go before
him.
